Glutaraldehyde vs PAA preformed vs PAA in situ in endoscope disinfection

Glutaraldehyde vs PAA preformed vs PAA in situ in endoscope disinfection

Information for glutaraldehyde taken from section II A 3 (Juan et al., 2013) is compared below to formulation knowledge of Peracide.

Glutaraldehyde vs In Situ Peracetic Acid

Glutaraldehyde vs ISPAA

Information for pre-formed PAA taken from section II C 2 (Juan et al., 2013) is compared below to formulation knowledge of Peracide.

Pre-formed PAA vs ISPAA

Furthermore, section 8.2.1 and 8.2.3 (Beilenhoff et al., 2008) discusses the advantages and disadvantages of glutaraldehyde and peracetic acid disinfectants respectively. 8.2.3 paragraph 2 states “Adverse effects are strongly linked to the pH value of the disinfectant solution, with minimal effects observed in a pH range between 7.5 and 10.0.”. Peracide is formulated to stabilise at a pH of 8-9, which contributes to the reduced material incompatibility and corrosion issues described above.

References

Beilenhoff, U. et al. (2008) ‘ESGE–ESGENA guideline: Cleaning and disinfection in gastrointestinal endoscopy’, Endoscopy, 40(11), pp. 939–957. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1077722.

Juan, M.R. et al. (2013) https://www.sgna.org/Portals/0/Issues/PDF/Infection-Prevention/6_HLDGuideline_2013.pdf. Chicago, IL. Available at: https://www.sgna.org/Portals/0/Issues/PDF/Infection-Prevention/6_HLDGuideline_2013.pdf (Accessed: 11 June 2024).

Next
Next

Differences between pre-formed, in situ peracetic acid, and chlorine dioxide